



Designer Ben Wilson has produced a monowheel – a cycle where the rider sits inside a large, spokeless wheel.
Members: Jessica Fong, Amandeep Singh, Neil Bullen, Humera Akhtar, Floriane Hilairet Mobility Discussion








Mate, it barely rains in Alicante !
JOSHUA Says:great!
leopoldo Says:muy buen proyecto.
gracias por hacernos la vida mas feliz con obras como estas.
One Says:
This is a knowledge. Worth publishing. Good way to gacefully light the halte and keep the suroudings nice and dark at night. Earthquake does not occure in Spain, right?






On September 29, Storefront for Art and Architecture will inaugurate a new exhibition showcasing research conducted over the past 3 years at ETH Zurich by Swiss architects Gramazio & Kohler into full-scale digital fabrication in architecture using industrial robots. At the same time, construction work will begin on Pike Loop, the first architectural project to be built on site by an industrial robot in the US.
Located on Pike Street, the robot, R-O-B, will work for up to four weeks—in full view of the public— to construct a brick wall, a highly sculptural response to the specific identity of the site. The same robot unit recently built the award-winning installation, Structural Oscillations, at the 2008 architectural biennial in Venice. For the Pike Loop installation, more than seven thousand bricks aggregate to form an infinite loop that weaves along the pedestrian island. In changing rhythms the loop lifts off the ground and intersects itself at its peaks. The installation was coordinated through the New York City Department of Transportation’s Urban Art Program.a


I was reading “All that is Solid Melts Into Air”, when I came across Marx's interpretation of Modernity:
“Modern environments and experiences cut across all boundaries of geography and ethnicity of class and nationality, of religion and ideology: in the sense, modernity can be said to unite mankind.”
He then goes on to say, “ The maelstrom of modern life has been fed from many sources: Great discoveries into physical sciences, changing our images of it and our place in it; the industrialisation of production, which transforms scientific knowledge into technology, creates new human environments and destroys old ones, speeds up the whole tempo of life, generates new forms of corporate power and class struggle; immense demographic upheavals, severing millions of people from their ancestral habitats, hurtling them half way across the world into new lives; rapid and often cataclysmic urban growth; systems of mass communication, dynamic in their development, enveloping and binding together the most diverse people and societies…mass social movements of people, challenging their political and economic rulers, striving to gain control over their lives…In the 20th Century, the social process that bring this maelstrom into being, and keep it in a state of perpetual becoming, have come to be known as “Modernisation.”
Apart from being left breathless and slightly dizzy, this got me thinking- is modernisation linked to Mobility, because according to this definition they seem very similar? This move from a world where none of what we have today was possible and was seen to be in distant future, is now easily accessible to everyone- a stage of mass communication.
He later goes on to say that we are now “Capable of everything except solidity and stability.” Is this a good thing or bad? Solidity means that we are stuck with everything permanent even when changes around may occur. Doesn’t our world of ever changing surroundings provide us with spaces that are adapting to our changing needs? Isn’t this change/ mobility necessary for us to survive?
Maybe this permanence can occur, if the built environment was naturally adaptable to our needs, if architecture was designed in such a way as to always accommodate the needs of its user…?? And referring to Neil's post, the building shown maybe a step closer to this, the ideas are there but are we able to translate into a built form?
Can one building remain permanent and modern at the same time??
What do you guys think???
The freedom and mobility of information through cyber space is becoming a much larger part of the modern world that we live in. This virtual world feels no boundaries in terms of its physical geography and has the ability to conduct an infinite amount of tasks at any one time, anywhere in the world.
When looking around for some information on this subject of virtual transferral of information and services I can upon something titled ‘The Weightless Economy’ (Pratt 2000). This is simply the concept that a product can be designed, made, advertised, sold and distributed with only an electronic presence, i.e it never takes any physical form, therefore is completely weightless. A good example for this type of industry is software development and sales. A company can design and produce the software via a computer, advertise on the internet and sell via e-commerce (internet sales). The software can then be downloaded straight onto the user computer. There fore there is almost no need for any geographical location and transportation. The product never enters the physical (real) world.
This then challenges the concept of physical mobility. It simply renders it unnecessary. Now obviously this is only one part of a global marketplace at the moment but if it were to expand then it could alter the way in which the think of and design pretty much everything. Town and city centres, i.e. the high street, will have to compete more and more with internet sales and e-commerce, which could come to a point whereby there is no longer a need for the physical shop, therefore no need for the high street, and in doing so changing the way our towns/cities are made up, designed and moved around.
Neil
Neil Bullen & Alex Hodson
Upon r
eading the brief and subsequent blog entries we looked at the physical aspect of mobility and its interaction with the built form; drawing from the futurists movements ideal city, which heavily revolves around mobility, and the present day buildings that incorporate parts of the futurists built metropolis.
The futurist mindset of the early 20th century was characterized with mass transportation hubs, vast communication networks, and multitudes of bridges. The futuristic idea of the city was to extend upwards into the sky, thus creating problems with movement of large numbers of people, systems of transportation were fundamental with numerous street levels including that of F.T. Marinetti and Antonio Sant’Elia whose desire to break away from gravity was parallel to the desire to break away from the past.
What we found interesting was the idea of the city changing shape with external elevators; when inside the rising elevator the city itself constantly changes, evolves and even grows as you get higher and your viewpoint becomes greater. These external elevators are shown in this sketch of Sant’Elia, La Citta Nuova, apartment buildings.
Not only providing its occupants with ever-changing views, but the outer skin of the building changing form. The Lloyds building, London, is an example of this today. The link below shows the view from within the elevator. The outer skin of the building shown in the image below.
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ya4JXEMKPJc&feature=related)
We recalled a scene from the film the minority report that is of a similar idea, instead of elevators, the side of the building is used as a motorway! Possibly a thought for the future, not sure we can imagine magnetically levitated cars flying up and down the side of a building just yet!
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WZ8kI42OJc)
Moving Walkways are becoming an ever-present in travel around cities, used regularly in airports, public transportation, and tourist attractions, cutting travel especially commuter’s travel times. Paris installed a high-speed travelator to ease the pressure on the metro, with a mixed reception, below is a link to an article outlining the problems. Is it too far fetched to imagine these walkways will replace the path we use today?
(http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3001182.stm)