It shows that we more mobile and we use our friend network to socialize and travel, so a new need appears, how to receive friends temporarily. The solution is to change the space to receive them, the column is a example of adaptability system.
Contributors
Tuesday, 20 October 2009
Adaptability to mobile life
Thursday, 15 October 2009
FUTURE CITY MOBILITY BICYCLE- Marten Wallgren
I thought this article was quite interesting. As i know alot of people love bicycles which will hugely become a key factor of future sustainable living!! Enjoy!!



Marten Wallgren, a Swede studying at the Royal College of Art and with three collegues, won the SeymourPowell award for their concept dubbed, “London Garden”. The scheme incorporates a
network of electric buses, taxis, and scooter-bikes, all of which interconnect to make London Garden a car-free zone.
The concept of London Garden includes special bicycles that operate in three modes. The first mode is the cruising option with the possible addition of regenerative braking. The second mode is a rigorous bicycling, where additional resistance is supplied to generate and store electricity. The third mode cashes in on stored power and turns the bike into an electric scooter. These bicycles are foldable, and are stored for community use in tall, treelike structures that double as bus stops. The bike racks themselves are meant to generate power from rainwater, sun, and even kinetically from the wind as its swooping arms away.
The bicycles also work as modular components within the urban environment where they can be folded and carried on-board electric buses and taxis. Once docked inside, they double as seats and the stored energy that was generated during pedaling is now transferred into the vehicle and even credited as currency towards your fare.
HUMERA ...

Social Mobility!
Mobilities- Amandeep
That picture of obese women is disgusting! Jess that a good point- will our door width change? I personally think that they won’t, maybe obese people will have houses tailored to their needs. I also think there will be an increase in the types of technology allowing them to travel more easily.
The Government are trying to decrease the amount of obesity by changing advertising and try to imply the consequence, but I don’t think its having a massive effect.
On another topic, I’ve been reading a few books and found some really interesting points. In ‘Mobilities’, John Urry compares the virtual and physical world, looking at them as two sides of the same coin.
The physical world is owned by no- one, and as the population of people increases within that area, their individual responsibility for it decreases. Urry says the more the population there is in the area, and the more diverse the people in the area, the more informal we tend to act within it; our behaviour changes as we feel more safe (e.g. a crowded train). Also the more we travel on the same type of transport/ take the same route, we become less formal to it. I can say this is true for me, as I’ve become very informal on trains after travelling on them for many years.
Urry mentions that mobile systems within a city are organised around processes that circulate people (e.g. structured roads, route ways, and cycle/rail tracks). The wealthy countries are likely to have more organised circulation within their cities (e.g. Singapore), than Third World Countries (e.g. Africa).
The reason we travel is due to a desire to gain something, our emotions ultimately motivate us to travel (e.g. seeing a loved one in another country). Therefore I think that we will always have some sort of physical mobility.
He compares this to the virtual which is much more informal as this is usually done individually and (usually) in place of comfort (home), and as Floraine mentioned, we feel safe from danger. We delve into a bubble world away from the physical and into a comfortable zone we create for ourselves. It can be seen as a non- place, but also a shared space, and is not owned by anyone. It can be seen as a tool to communicate, a place used for its convenience. If you look at the mobile phone, it has allowed us all types of communication (i.e. phone, email, sms) all in the palm of our hand. It is a revolutionary tool that has changed how society behaves. Adverts selling ringtones, software downloaded via text and many more functions are used, as this allows convenience to both seller and user.
Our Dying World

Transport and the effects on our environment!
There has been a massive push for a reduction in our carbon footprint, and in many ways we are succeeding however in transportation, emmissons are still rising!
Having accessiblity to different modes of transport, can depend on a numebr of things, the distance you intend to travel, but even if the distance is short, still people will chose to drive instead of walk, I know I am guilty of this on a lazy day.
If we couldnt aford to drive however, we would be forced to walk or to catch public transport so in essance having a reduced carbon foot print is related to amount of money you have?
Aviation accounts for a lot of transport pollution, but once again you can only fly if you can afford it!
IS there a way to make people take action and reduce their carbon foot print?
Making the public transport better?
I may seem a bit sceptical but I think it would be a very hard job getting people out of the comfortable cars, and onto a bus!
Immobility

Physical Immobility
When does obesity become disablity?
Our nation is getting bigger and bigger! When does the standard width of a door way get bigger?
As architects of the future, how are the disablities of today physically going to effect the way we design everyday things?
About 46% of men in England and 32% of women are overweight
an additional 17% of men and 21% of women are obese!!!
Overweight and obesity are increasing.
The percentage of adults who are obese has roughly doubled since the mid-1980's.
I think that it wont be long before legislation is passed, in which to alow the mobility of our MASSIVE population to be accounted for.
Wednesday, 14 October 2009
Niel's & Floraine's post- Amandeep
As Neil mentioned, I also think Floraine’s blog entries have been very insightful, and have helped me understand mobility from another perspective. She mentioned the transfer from the physical world to a more digital world which I think is the way we’re heading. Here’s a great video I found on one of the other blogs about gaming that shows human design development:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ZM4_2cuZwA
Niel also picked up on a lot of good points, as well as how banks are trying to reduce staff to so that more can be done online. This got me thinking- What will happen to the more physical jobs, will they be replaced by more virtual/ computer jobs?
When I think of a physical job , the bus comes to mind, as it’s a very old fashioned way of travel which may in the future be replaced. We as a society are striving towards a more efficient, faster and cheaper transport; if you look at canals they are not used as a method of transport anymore, but more of a social place.
The poster shows how the council are advertising the canal, as a place to socialise, look how much it’s changed from its original purpose.
This may mean that our transport systems we know of today (i.e. buses, trains), may become obsolete and replaced with newer technology that is more efficient. Does this mean that jobs linked to physical travel will reduce (e.g. Buses becoming obsolete and replaced with newer technology)? But then does this mean we may have an increase in virtual jobs (e.g. computing, programming etc.)? I believe the end of this digital revolution is limitless...
